Silniki Mitsubishi Lancer
(Zużycie kombinowane (NEDC))| Silnik | Zużycie kombinowane (NEDC) |
|---|---|
| 1.6 ClearTec Top 86 kW | 5.5 l/100km |
| Sportback 1.8 Plus CVT-{automatic} 103 kW | 6.6 l/100km |
1. 1.6 ClearTec Top 86 kW
5.5 l/100km
2. Sportback 1.8 Plus CVT-{automatic} 103 kW
6.6 l/100km
Warianty
Warianty Mitsubishi Lancer: Lancer Sportback vs. Lancer Sportlimousine
(Zużycie kombinowane (NEDC))| Nazwa wariantu | Zużycie kombinowane (NEDC) |
|---|---|
| Lancer Sportback | 5.5 l/100km |
| Lancer Sportlimousine | 5.5 l/100km |
1. Lancer Sportback
5.5 l/100km
2. Lancer Sportlimousine
5.5 l/100km
Zużycie kombinowane (nedc) w porównaniu do innych modeli Mitsubishi
Mitsubishi Lancer w porównaniu do innych obecnych modeli Mitsubishi
(Zużycie kombinowane (NEDC))| Nazwa wariantu | Zużycie kombinowane (NEDC) |
|---|---|
| Outlander Plug-In Hybrid 2.4 Plug-In Hybrid Basis 4WD 165 kW | 1.8 l/100km |
| Space Star 1.2 ClearTec Top 59 kW | 4.2 l/100km |
| Lancer Sportback Sportback 1.6 ClearTec Plus 86 kW | 5.5 l/100km |
| Lancer Sportlimousine Sportback 1.6 ClearTec Plus 86 kW | 5.5 l/100km |
| ASX 1.8 DI-D+ Invite 2WD 110 kW | 5.9 l/100km |
| Eclipse Cross 1.5 T ClearTec Basis 2WD 120 kW | 6.6 l/100km |
| L200 2.4 DI-D+ Double Cab Edition 100 4WD 133 kW | 6.9 l/100km |
| Outlander 2.4 Plug-In Hybrid Basis 4WD 165 kW | 7.3 l/100km |
| Pajero 3.2 DI-D 147 kW | 7.8 l/100km |
| Electric Vehicle Electric Vehicle 49 kW | 12.5 l/100km |
| i-MiEV Electric Vehicle 49 kW | 13.5 l/100km |
2. Space Star 1.2 ClearTec Top 59 kW
4.2 l/100km
5. ASX 1.8 DI-D+ Invite 2WD 110 kW
5.9 l/100km
6. Eclipse Cross 1.5 T ClearTec Basis 2WD 120 kW
6.6 l/100km
8. Outlander 2.4 Plug-In Hybrid Basis 4WD 165 kW
7.3 l/100km
9. Pajero 3.2 DI-D 147 kW
7.8 l/100km
10. Electric Vehicle Electric Vehicle 49 kW
12.5 l/100km
11. i-MiEV Electric Vehicle 49 kW
13.5 l/100km
Jak zużycie kombinowane (nedc) modelu Mitsubishi Lancer wypada w porównaniu do najbliższych konkurentów?
Mitsubishi Lancer vs. podobne samochody
(Zużycie kombinowane (NEDC))| Model samochodu | Zużycie kombinowane (NEDC) |
|---|---|
| SEAT Arona 1.0 EcoTSI 2017 | 4.9 l/100km |
| KIA Stonic 1.2 2017 | 5.2 l/100km |
| Skoda Karoq 1.0 TSI 2017 | 5.2 l/100km |
| SEAT Ateca 1.0 TSI Ecomotive 2016 | 5.2 l/100km |
| Ford EcoSport 1.0 EcoBoost 2017 | 5.2 l/100km |
| Suzuki Vitara 1.0 Boosterjet 2018 | 5.3 l/100km |
| Peugeot Rifter L1 1.2 PureTech 110 2018 | 5.5 l/100km |
| VW Touran 1.2 TSI BMT 2015 | 5.5 l/100km |
| Mitsubishi Lancer 1.6 ClearTec 2014 | 5.5 l/100km |
| Renault Scénic ENERGY TCe 115 2016 | 5.8 l/100km |
| Fiat 500X Cross 1.0 Firefly Turbo 2018 | 6 l/100km |
| Abarth 595 2016 | 6 l/100km |
| Honda CR-V 1.5 Turbo 2018 | 6.3 l/100km |
| Suzuki Jimny 1.5 2018 | 6.8 l/100km |
1. SEAT Arona 1.0 EcoTSI 2017
4.9 l/100km
2. KIA Stonic 1.2 2017
5.2 l/100km
3. Skoda Karoq 1.0 TSI 2017
5.2 l/100km
4. SEAT Ateca 1.0 TSI Ecomotive 2016
5.2 l/100km
5. Ford EcoSport 1.0 EcoBoost 2017
5.2 l/100km
6. Suzuki Vitara 1.0 Boosterjet 2018
5.3 l/100km
7. Peugeot Rifter L1 1.2 PureTech 110 2018
5.5 l/100km
8. VW Touran 1.2 TSI BMT 2015
5.5 l/100km
9. Mitsubishi Lancer 1.6 ClearTec 2014
5.5 l/100km
10. Renault Scénic ENERGY TCe 115 2016
5.8 l/100km
12. Abarth 595 2016
6 l/100km
13. Honda CR-V 1.5 Turbo 2018
6.3 l/100km
14. Suzuki Jimny 1.5 2018
6.8 l/100km