Porównanie: Zużycie paliwa łączne (WLTP) Ford Puma wobec konkurencji 2024

I 1997
II 2020
Puma II (1. Facelift) 2024

Spis treści:

Ford Puma - Jakie jest zużycie kombinowane (wltp) różnych silników?

Silniki Ford Puma

(Zużycie kombinowane (WLTP))
Silniki Ford Puma
SilnikZużycie kombinowane (WLTP)
1.0 EcoBoost Hybrid Titanium 92 kW5.4 l/100km
1.0 EcoBoost Hybrid Titanium PowerShift {automatic} 92 kW5.7 l/100km
1.0 EcoBoost Hybrid Titanium PowerShift {automatic} 114 kW5.7 l/100km
1.0 EcoBoost Hybrid ST PowerShift {automatic} 117 kW6 l/100km
1. 1.0 EcoBoost Hybrid Titanium 92 kW 5.4 l/100km
2. 1.0 EcoBoost Hybrid Titanium PowerShift {automatic} 92 kW 5.7 l/100km
3. 1.0 EcoBoost Hybrid Titanium PowerShift {automatic} 114 kW 5.7 l/100km
4. 1.0 EcoBoost Hybrid ST PowerShift {automatic} 117 kW 6 l/100km

Warianty

Warianty Ford Puma: Puma vs. Puma ST

(Zużycie kombinowane (WLTP))
Zużycie kombinowane (WLTP): Warianty Ford Puma
Nazwa wariantuZużycie kombinowane (WLTP)
Puma5.4 l/100km
Puma ST6 l/100km
1. Puma 5.4 l/100km
2. Puma ST 6 l/100km

Zużycie kombinowane (wltp) w porównaniu do innych modeli Ford

Ford Puma w porównaniu do innych obecnych modeli Ford

(Zużycie kombinowane (WLTP))
Zużycie kombinowane (WLTP): Puma vs. other models by Ford
Nazwa wariantuZużycie kombinowane (WLTP)
Explorer 3.0 EcoBoost Plug-in-Hybrid Platinum {automatic} 336 kW3.1 l/100km
Kuga Active 2.5 PHEV Titanium CVT 178 kW5.3 l/100km
Puma 1.0 EcoBoost Hybrid ST PowerShift {automatic} 117 kW5.4 l/100km
Focus Turnier ST 206 kW5.4 l/100km
Focus Active Turnier ST 206 kW5.4 l/100km
Focus Active Turnier Turnier ST 206 kW5.5 l/100km
Focus Turnier Turnier ST 206 kW5.5 l/100km
Mondeo {sedan} Turnier 2.0 EcoBlue Business Edition {automatic} 140 kW5.6 l/100km
Mondeo Turnier Turnier 2.0 EcoBlue Business Edition {automatic} 140 kW5.7 l/100km
Puma ST 1.0 EcoBoost Hybrid ST PowerShift {automatic} 117 kW6 l/100km
Kuga 2.5 PHEV Titanium CVT 178 kW6.4 l/100km
Tourneo Connect 2.0 EcoBlue Sport {automatic} 90 kW6.4 l/100km
Galaxy 2.0 EcoBlue Trend {automatic} 110 kW6.6 l/100km
Fiesta ST 1.5 EcoBoost X 147 kW6.7 l/100km
Tourneo Courier 1.0 EcoBoost Start/Stopp Trend 92 kW6.7 l/100km
Transit Custom Kombi Kombi 320 L2 2.0 EcoBlue Trend 81 kW7.2 l/100km
Tourneo Custom 340 L2 2.5 Duratec PHEV Sport {automatic} 171 kW7.4 l/100km
Mondeo Turnier 2.0 EcoBlue Business Edition {automatic} 140 kW7.4 l/100km
Focus ST Turnier ST 206 kW8 l/100km
Focus ST Turnier Turnier ST 206 kW8 l/100km
S-MAX 2.0 EcoBlue Bi-Turbo ST-Line {automatic} 177 kW8.4 l/100km
Transit Custom Nugget Kombi 320 L2 2.0 EcoBlue Trend 81 kW9 l/100km
Ranger Raptor 3.0 EcoBoost e-4WD {automatic} 212 kW10.1 l/100km
Ranger Raptor Raptor 3.0 EcoBoost e-4WD {automatic} 212 kW10.6 l/100km
Bronco 2.7 Ti-VCT EcoBoost Outer Banks 4x4 {automatic} 246 kW11.3 l/100km
Mustang Convertible Convertible 5.0 Ti-VCT V8 GT {automatic} 328 kW12 l/100km
Mustang Fastback Convertible 5.0 Ti-VCT V8 GT {automatic} 328 kW12 l/100km
Explorer EV AWD 250 kW15.5 l/100km
Mustang Mach-E Rally 358 kW17.2 l/100km
Mustang Mach-E Rally Rally 358 kW21.3 l/100km
E-Transit Custom {VAN} Kombi 320 L2 2.0 EcoBlue Trend 81 kW22.4 l/100km
E-Transit Custom Kombi Kombi 320 L2 2.0 EcoBlue Trend 81 kW22.6 l/100km
E-Tourneo Custom 340 L2 2.5 Duratec PHEV Sport {automatic} 171 kW25.6 l/100km
E-Transit {VAN} Kombi 350 L2 2.0 TDCi Trend 77 kW26.4 l/100km
1. Explorer 3.0 EcoBoost Plug-in-Hybrid Platinum {automatic} 336 kW 3.1 l/100km
2. Kuga Active 2.5 PHEV Titanium CVT 178 kW 5.3 l/100km
3. Puma 1.0 EcoBoost Hybrid ST PowerShift {automatic} 117 kW 5.4 l/100km
4. Focus Turnier ST 206 kW 5.4 l/100km
5. Focus Active Turnier ST 206 kW 5.4 l/100km
6. Focus Active Turnier Turnier ST 206 kW 5.5 l/100km
7. Focus Turnier Turnier ST 206 kW 5.5 l/100km
8. Mondeo {sedan} Turnier 2.0 EcoBlue Business Edition {automatic} 140 kW 5.6 l/100km
9. Mondeo Turnier Turnier 2.0 EcoBlue Business Edition {automatic} 140 kW 5.7 l/100km
10. Puma ST 1.0 EcoBoost Hybrid ST PowerShift {automatic} 117 kW 6 l/100km
11. Kuga 2.5 PHEV Titanium CVT 178 kW 6.4 l/100km
12. Tourneo Connect 2.0 EcoBlue Sport {automatic} 90 kW 6.4 l/100km
13. Galaxy 2.0 EcoBlue Trend {automatic} 110 kW 6.6 l/100km
14. Fiesta ST 1.5 EcoBoost X 147 kW 6.7 l/100km
15. Tourneo Courier 1.0 EcoBoost Start/Stopp Trend 92 kW 6.7 l/100km
16. Transit Custom Kombi Kombi 320 L2 2.0 EcoBlue Trend 81 kW 7.2 l/100km
17. Tourneo Custom 340 L2 2.5 Duratec PHEV Sport {automatic} 171 kW 7.4 l/100km
18. Mondeo Turnier 2.0 EcoBlue Business Edition {automatic} 140 kW 7.4 l/100km
19. Focus ST Turnier ST 206 kW 8 l/100km
20. Focus ST Turnier Turnier ST 206 kW 8 l/100km
21. S-MAX 2.0 EcoBlue Bi-Turbo ST-Line {automatic} 177 kW 8.4 l/100km
22. Transit Custom Nugget Kombi 320 L2 2.0 EcoBlue Trend 81 kW 9 l/100km
23. Ranger Raptor 3.0 EcoBoost e-4WD {automatic} 212 kW 10.1 l/100km
24. Ranger Raptor Raptor 3.0 EcoBoost e-4WD {automatic} 212 kW 10.6 l/100km
25. Bronco 2.7 Ti-VCT EcoBoost Outer Banks 4x4 {automatic} 246 kW 11.3 l/100km
26. Mustang Convertible Convertible 5.0 Ti-VCT V8 GT {automatic} 328 kW 12 l/100km
27. Mustang Fastback Convertible 5.0 Ti-VCT V8 GT {automatic} 328 kW 12 l/100km
28. Explorer EV AWD 250 kW 15.5 l/100km
29. Mustang Mach-E Rally 358 kW 17.2 l/100km
30. Mustang Mach-E Rally Rally 358 kW 21.3 l/100km
31. E-Transit Custom {VAN} Kombi 320 L2 2.0 EcoBlue Trend 81 kW 22.4 l/100km
32. E-Transit Custom Kombi Kombi 320 L2 2.0 EcoBlue Trend 81 kW 22.6 l/100km
33. E-Tourneo Custom 340 L2 2.5 Duratec PHEV Sport {automatic} 171 kW 25.6 l/100km
34. E-Transit {VAN} Kombi 350 L2 2.0 TDCi Trend 77 kW 26.4 l/100km

Jak zużycie kombinowane (wltp) modelu Ford Puma wypada w porównaniu do najbliższych konkurentów?

Ford Puma vs. podobne samochody

(Zużycie kombinowane (WLTP))
Zużycie kombinowane (WLTP): Ford Puma vs. podobne samochody
Model samochoduZużycie kombinowane (WLTP)
Suzuki S-Cross 1.4 Boosterjet Hybrid 20225.3 l/100km
Citroen C4 PureTech 130 20205.3 l/100km
VW Taigo 1.0 TSI OPF 20215.4 l/100km
Ford Puma 1.0 EcoBoost Hybrid 20245.4 l/100km
Opel Mokka 1.2 DI Turbo 20215.5 l/100km
DS Automobiles DS 3 PureTech 100 20235.6 l/100km
Peugeot 2008 1.2 PureTech 100 20235.6 l/100km
VW T-Cross 1.0 TSI OPF 20245.6 l/100km
Hyundai Bayon 1.2 MPI 20215.7 l/100km
Opel Crossland 1.2 20215.9 l/100km
VW T-Roc 1.0 TSI OPF 20226 l/100km
Hyundai Kona 1.0 T-GDI 20216.1 l/100km
Opel Grandland 1.2 DI Turbo 20226.1 l/100km
Renault Austral Mild Hybrid 140 20226.2 l/100km
Citroen C5 Aircross PureTech 130 Stop&Start 20226.2 l/100km
VW Tiguan 1.5 TSI OPF 20206.2 l/100km
Citroen C3 Aircross PureTech 100 20246.2 l/100km
KIA XCeed 1.0 T-GDI 20226.3 l/100km
Peugeot 5008 1.2 PureTech 130 20216.3 l/100km
KIA Sportage 1.6 GDI 20226.7 l/100km
Mazda CX-5 2.0 SKYACTIV-G 165 20216.8 l/100km
Hyundai Tucson 1.6 T-GDI 20207 l/100km
MG HS 1.5T GDI 20237.4 l/100km
SsangYong Torres 1.5 GDI-T 20237.9 l/100km
1. Suzuki S-Cross 1.4 Boosterjet Hybrid 2022 5.3 l/100km
2. Citroen C4 PureTech 130 2020 5.3 l/100km
3. VW Taigo 1.0 TSI OPF 2021 5.4 l/100km
4. Ford Puma 1.0 EcoBoost Hybrid 2024 5.4 l/100km
5. Opel Mokka 1.2 DI Turbo 2021 5.5 l/100km
6. DS Automobiles DS 3 PureTech 100 2023 5.6 l/100km
7. Peugeot 2008 1.2 PureTech 100 2023 5.6 l/100km
8. VW T-Cross 1.0 TSI OPF 2024 5.6 l/100km
9. Hyundai Bayon 1.2 MPI 2021 5.7 l/100km
10. Opel Crossland 1.2 2021 5.9 l/100km
11. VW T-Roc 1.0 TSI OPF 2022 6 l/100km
12. Hyundai Kona 1.0 T-GDI 2021 6.1 l/100km
13. Opel Grandland 1.2 DI Turbo 2022 6.1 l/100km
14. Renault Austral Mild Hybrid 140 2022 6.2 l/100km
15. Citroen C5 Aircross PureTech 130 Stop&Start 2022 6.2 l/100km
16. VW Tiguan 1.5 TSI OPF 2020 6.2 l/100km
17. Citroen C3 Aircross PureTech 100 2024 6.2 l/100km
18. KIA XCeed 1.0 T-GDI 2022 6.3 l/100km
19. Peugeot 5008 1.2 PureTech 130 2021 6.3 l/100km
20. KIA Sportage 1.6 GDI 2022 6.7 l/100km
21. Mazda CX-5 2.0 SKYACTIV-G 165 2021 6.8 l/100km
22. Hyundai Tucson 1.6 T-GDI 2020 7 l/100km
23. MG HS 1.5T GDI 2023 7.4 l/100km
24. SsangYong Torres 1.5 GDI-T 2023 7.9 l/100km

Podobne samochody

Suzuki S-Cross
Zużycie kombinowane (WLTP):
-2% (5.3 l/100km)


Porównaj
DS Automobiles DS 3
Zużycie kombinowane (WLTP):
+4% (5.6 l/100km)


Porównaj
Peugeot 2008
Zużycie kombinowane (WLTP):
+4% (5.6 l/100km)


Porównaj
VW T-Roc
Zużycie kombinowane (WLTP):
+11% (6 l/100km)


Porównaj
VW T-Cross
Zużycie kombinowane (WLTP):
+4% (5.6 l/100km)


Porównaj
KIA XCeed
Zużycie kombinowane (WLTP):
+17% (6.3 l/100km)


Porównaj
VW Taigo
Zużycie kombinowane (WLTP):
0% (5.4 l/100km)


Porównaj
Opel Mokka
Zużycie kombinowane (WLTP):
+2% (5.5 l/100km)


Porównaj
Hyundai Kona
Zużycie kombinowane (WLTP):
+13% (6.1 l/100km)


Porównaj
Opel Crossland
Zużycie kombinowane (WLTP):
+9% (5.9 l/100km)


Porównaj
Hyundai Bayon
Zużycie kombinowane (WLTP):
+6% (5.7 l/100km)


Porównaj
Renault Captur
Zużycie kombinowane (WLTP):
-100% (0 l/100km)


Porównaj

Compare with ...

TOPlist